Posted 29th November 2018 | 6 Comments

Arriva blamed for Welsh train problems

UPDATED 30.11.18, 11.58

THE poor state of the Welsh train fleet is being largely blamed on the previous franchise holder Arriva, although Arriva has said that it acted in good faith.

Many rail services in Wales are still short-formed or being replaced by buses, after many trains were damaged by the autumn conditions. However, there have been talks with Network Rail, and the situation is now reported to be improving.

Arriva took control of the first Wales & Borders franchise in 2003 and ran it until October this year, but there were no provisions in its contract for any replacement rolling stock. As a result, nearly all the trains on Wales & Borders routes were built at least 30 years ago, in the days of British Rail.

Speaking in the National Assembly, transport secretary Ken Skates said that contract had been ‘dreadful’.

He said: ‘We inherited a fleet of trains that have been very poorly maintained, which we did not have full and proper access to ahead of inheriting them, and that, along with Storm Callum, and taking over the franchise in the autumn period, presented huge challenges for Transport for Wales and the operator and the delivery partner.

‘The standards of the delivery of the services were too low, because the contract that was agreed 15 years ago was not fit for purpose, and so, essentially, Arriva Trains Wales had a lower bar to get over. We had no levers at our disposal, no powers and no way of compelling Arriva Trains Wales to up the bar to improve the standard of service, and that includes maintenance. So, in particular in the period leading up to the transfer of the franchise, there was no commercial incentive for Arriva Trains Wales to invest in maintenance over and above what was essential through law.’

Mr Skates also confirmed that the number of trains available for service each day is still well below the requirements of the full timetable. He explained: ‘Transport for Wales, as the managing and operator partner for Welsh Government, would like to apologise, but I think it also needs to be recognised that, in a very short space of time, Transport for Wales have worked incredibly hard to bring a number of trains back into use.

‘Normally, we operate at about 80 per cent of the entire fleet. There are 127 trains in the fleet, so normally we’d be operating at around about 105, with the remaining trains in for servicing and maintenance. I can tell the Member that, as of this morning, the number was up to 96. We’re therefore operating at around about 76 per cent. It will return to normal—back to the 80 per cent—within a few weeks.’

Mr Skates also confirmed that the lack of wheel-slide protection on the former British Rail trains was another factor, which became critical in the leaf-fall season. He said: ‘The problem with the transfer of the franchise was that Transport for Wales were not given full and proper access to be able to gauge the condition of it. However, what they did do was make sure that there were enough wheel sets. This is part and parcel of the problem now. The wheel sets were flattened as a consequence of the lack of traction. So, they ordered a sufficient number of wheel sets, but it still takes time to take the trains off the rails and apply the new wheel sets.’

He added: ‘We're looking into the reasons why this issue affected the Wales and Borders network more than other parts of the UK. What we have found is that none of the rolling stock on our franchise are operating with wheel-slide protection. This is significant because trains across the rest of the UK have been operating with that protection. What we have now learnt is that, potentially, the problems were worsened in Wales because in the absence of wheel-slide protection and as a consequence of a decision taken in 2016—and this is across the UK—to stop applying sand to rails, it meant that the traction on Welsh rail lines has been worse this autumn.’

Mr Skates has also been in discussions with Network Rail chairman Sir Peter Hendy, and said ’there have been significant improvements in the space of a week, with more than 10 per cent of the trains now having been brought back into use, but this remains a very challenging period due to the dreadful underinvestment in our rail network over the past 15 years.’

In response, Arriva said: ‘Over £30 million has been invested by Arriva into the railway in Wales over the past fifteen years and we have left the network in a much stronger and safer condition than when we found it.

‘We have acted in good faith as the franchise has come to an end and actively invited Transport for Wales and the new franchise holder to work with us ensure as smooth a transition as possible.

‘We provided access to our fleet and staff for many weeks prior to the handover and worked in an open and transparent way with all parties to develop a mutually agreed handover plan.

‘This year we delivered our autumn preparedness plan in full and, in doing so, increased spending on train maintenance relative to previous years. In this instance, and others, we have gone above and beyond our contractual obligations.

‘All spare parts and tools within our control were transferred to the new franchise holder with all parties having access to take stock reviews prior to transfer.’

Reader Comments:

Views expressed in submitted comments are that of the author, and not necessarily shared by Railnews.

  • Chris Jones-Bridger, Buckley Flintshire

    Thank you for the update with Arriva's response. Over the course of a 15 year contract in rail investment terms £30 million pounds is barely juggling the small change in the bottom of the pocket. Throughout the franchisee enjoyed positive cash flow for it's parent company. Clearly Arriva have been quiet happy with their return on the franchise deal.

  • Chris Jones-Bridger, Buckley Flintshire

    The privateers promised that privatisation would unleash untold benefits of the entrepreneurial enterprise & innovation on the rail industry. The fifteen year stewardship of the W&B franchise by Arriva should be held as an example of all that is rotten with the franchise system.

    As developed by the SRA the contract was unimaginative failing to make allowance for changing trends in ridership with no mechanism for periodic reviews which could have reset the parameters allowing for changing demand. Despite having limited powers due to lack of devolved responsibility for rail matters over time the Welsh Assembly was able to underwrite limited but worthwhile additions such as the Cambrian service enhancements. Too often the only flair shown by the franchisee was in cost cutting which to re-quote Sir Peter Parker led to the 'crumbling edge of quality'.

    During it's tenure Arriva had always sweated the limited pool of rolling stock. Availability has always been critical. At times too numerous to list units have been lost due to mishaps such as fires, level crossing incidents & tree strikes. When the franchise changed hands availability was already depleted due to on going disability modifications to units before the worst of the wheel slide damage took affect.

    That the 14x fleets are still soldiering on is an indictment of so much that went wrong with franchising. Poorly specified contracts with franchisees focused on cash flow management rather than incentivised on service improvement & innovation have ensured that the ROSCO's have made the best of their limited initial investment.

  • Mr Paul, birkenhead

    As the trains are owned by a large privatee comapny and leased to ariva trains wales then now transport for wales, the lease company needs to be asked why the failures, and why after 20 plus years of pacers running its just come to light as a problem now.
    [The maintenance of leased rolling stock is the operator's responsibility.--Ed.]

  • Gareth Marston, Newtown (Powys)

    Would "those idiots in Whtehall" back in 2003 when the "the franchise not fit for purpose" contract was awarded happen to be under Labour party control with South Wales MP's as Junior Ministers at the time in the DfT?
    [Well, ahem, it was very little to do with the DfT. The 2003 W&B contract was managed and awarded by the Strategic Rail Authority.--Ed.]

  • Tony Pearce, Reading

    First Rule In Management, - If you are in trouble blame your predecessor. Second Rule - Next time you are in trouble, start looking for another Job. The excuse only works once.

  • DEREK EVANS, PORTHMADOG

    Don't blame Arriva - blame those idiots in Whitehall for the way the franchise was written. Considering the old stock Arriva had to operate with,I think they did a good job. As Mr Skates says "the franchise was not fit for purpose".

Have Your Say

Please read Guidance Notes for Contributors

Submitted comments are subject to approval prior to public posting. Railnews reserve the right to reject, alter or censor any submissions. Railnews also reserve the right to reproduce submissions in any format.

Railnews may, from time to time, send out marketing emails to subscribers and website users. If you would prefer not to receive these emails, please tick this box.