Posted 13th July 2021 | 4 Comments

Transport campaigners condemn facemasks plan

PLANS to let rail and bus operators choose whether to enforce the wearing of facemasks from next Monday have left transport campaigners 'disappointed'.

The Prime Minister said last night that 'We expect and recommend that people wear a face covering in crowded and enclosed spaces where you come into contact with those you don't normally meet, such as on public transport.'

The Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham said he has delayed making a decision about facemasks on Manchester trams, because he wanted to avoid adding to the confusion, while it is also unclear whether the operators would have any enforcement powers after the rules change.

The chief executive of the Campaign for Better Transport Paul Tuohy said: 'We are disappointed that public transport was singled out and made an example of by the Prime Minster in his speech yesterday. The Government should have shown leadership, rather than hiding behind the operators, and the lack of consistency will cause problems for operators and passengers alike.

'The Government must now reassure people that public transport is safe to use and promote its use as we move onto the next stage of the roadmap. We simply cannot afford the long-term health and environmental consequences of increased car use.'

Meanwhile, the Rail Delivery Group said: 'Rail companies will ask people to follow the government guidance and, out of respect for others, wear face coverings if an indoor setting is busy. Train travel is low risk, with the majority of carriages well ventilated by air conditioning systems or by doors and windows. As restrictions lift, we will continue carrying out extra cleaning and providing better information about how busy services are, so that our passengers can travel with confidence.'

Reader Comments:

Views expressed in submitted comments are that of the author, and not necessarily shared by Railnews.

  • Melvyn, Canvey Island , Essex

    So on a1000 seat Thameslink train 1 passenger is required to wear a face mask yet 5 people in a small car are and have never been required to wear face masks despite the far higher dangers ..Let alone the nonsense of wearing a face mask on an virtually empty open air platform!

    So how many cases can be traced to use of rail or other public transport services ?

  • Michael Breslin, Liverpool

    If mask wearing is kept mandatory on buses and trains only, for the foreseeable future, it gives the impression that public transport is still dangerous for your health. On the other hand, pubs and nightclubs will be able to pack punters in again without proof of vaccination.

  • David Brex, Newport-on-Tay

    What a self inflicted shambles. Should be 'fun' at Berwick and Carlisle stations - I feel sorry for the staff. Has anybody considers what happens on planes flying between England and Scotland as they fly into Scottish 'airspace'

  • Tony Pearce, Reading

    I would prefer it still to be mandatory on all Trains and Buses. Perhaps it is a decision that could be renewed by Parliament every 3 months. But having a free-for-all is going to put a lot of people off travelling.

Have Your Say

Please read Guidance Notes for Contributors

Submitted comments are subject to approval prior to public posting. Railnews reserve the right to reject, alter or censor any submissions. Railnews also reserve the right to reproduce submissions in any format.

Railnews may, from time to time, send out marketing emails to subscribers and website users. If you would prefer not to receive these emails, please tick this box.