Posted 12th February 2018 | 4 Comments

MPs launch second probe into East Coast collapse

POLITICIANS at Westminster have launched their own investigation into the crisis at the Virgin Trains East Coast franchise.

The new inquiry by the House of Commons Transport Committee comes hard on the heels of a separate examination by the National Audit Office, which was announced at the end of January. The NAO, which is the official national spending watchdog, will be looking hard at the terms of the government’s possible deal with Stagecoach and Virgin Trains, which critics described then as a ‘bailout’.

The franchise should have run from 2015 to 2023, but transport secretary Chris Grayling revealed at the end of November that it was to be replaced by an ‘East Coast Partnership’ from 2020.

Those plans have also collapsed, as the full extent of losses sustained by Stagecoach and Virgin have become clearer. It is now known that Stagecoach, which has 90 per cent of the franchise, is alone set to lose some £200 million.

The immediate future is looking uncertain. Chris Grayling could repeat history by taking the franchise back under public control, which was the remedy chosen in 2009 by the Labour government when National Express said it would have to surrender the contract. GNER had previously withdrawn from East Coast three years earlier.

Mr Grayling could alternatively negotiate an emergency arrangement with Stagecoach and Virgin, which would then run East Coast on a not-for-profit basis for a limited period in return for a management fee. This was the mechanism chosen when GNER departed.

Mr Grayling told the Transport Committee on 22 January that the franchise’s problem was ‘purely and simply about the revenue that it has received to date’.

Then on 5 February Mr Grayling warned that Virgin Trains East Coast was likely to fail within ‘a very small number of months’, triggering further criticism from the unions and opposition politicians. The RMT has repeated its call for immediate and permanent renationalisation, while Labour’s shadow transport secretary Andy McDonald accused the government of propping up a ‘crumbling system’.

MP Lilian Greenwood, who chairs the Transport Committee, said: “This failure – not once, but three times – has drawn criticism from all corners.

“There are serious questions to be asked of the train operator, Network Rail and Ministers and the Transport Committee intends to ask them. The failure of the East Coast franchise has wider implications for rail franchising and the competitiveness of the current system. Lessons need to be learned by all concerned.

“In the meantime, the Department for Transport must take the right steps to protect passengers and taxpayers. Safeguards must be put in place to restore public confidence in the sustainability of our railways.”

Reader Comments:

Views expressed in submitted comments are that of the author, and not necessarily shared by Railnews.

  • Andrew Gwilt , Basildon Essex

    Or why not allow Mr Corbyn to take over the East Coast franchise. I think he’ll do a fabulous job. As he wants to nationalise the railways. Which I think it’s a great idea.

  • Chris Jones-Bridger, Buckley

    Class 91 & Mark 4 were certainly designed for 140 mph operation but it is signaling issues particularly signal sighting & associated braking distances for running in excess of 125 mph that have prevented this capability being exploited on ECML. Additional flashing green aspects were provided between Peterborough & Grantham to provide for running above 125 mph but never for commercial services. Experience showed that to achieve higher operational speed in cab signalling was desirable as now successfully used on HS1.

    The ECML electrical supply was specified for the intercity & suburban trainplan of the day. That current upgrades may be out of step with the increased demands being placed on it today are very much a reflection of the disjointed approach to the routes strategic investment brought about by the dysfunctional structure of the 21st century railway.

  • Tony Pearce, READING

    The British Rail Class 91 is a 225 km/h (140 mph), electric locomotive, with train, ordered as a component of the East Coast Main Line modernisation & electrification programme of the late 1980s. However it needs a much better electricity supply to run at those speeds. British Railways, British Rail, Railtrack and Network Rail have all failed to upgrade the Electricity Supply so to this day they run at 125 mph max. They are now due to be replaced. Just one reason why the East Coast line is a mess

  • Chris Jones-Bridger, Buckley

    I'm sure we'll all be enlightened by the reports from the pending enquiries but it is now time for the Transport Secretary & DfT to show strategic leadership & ensure a competent management team is in place running ECML inter city to see it through the introduction of the IEP fleet. The customers & staff of the route demand direction & consistently free from the contractual wrangles that have blighted the routes development over the past decade.

Have Your Say

Please read Guidance Notes for Contributors

Submitted comments are subject to approval prior to public posting. Railnews reserve the right to reject, alter or censor any submissions. Railnews also reserve the right to reproduce submissions in any format.

Railnews may, from time to time, send out marketing emails to subscribers and website users. If you would prefer not to receive these emails, please tick this box.