Posted 9th August 2022 | 4 Comments

War of words with union after Avanti announces service cuts

 Avanti West Coast has announced a sharp reduction of its services from Sunday, saying that staff absence is making the current timetable unreliable. But the RMT is denying that absence is the cause of the problems, and is demanding a meeting with transport secretary Grant Shapps to discuss the situation.

Avanti is cutting its services so that there will be just one train an hour between London and Manchester, and one an hour to Wolverhampton, one to Glasgow Central and one to Liverpool. One of the Wolverhampton trains will continue to Edinburgh every two hours or to Preston, sometimes continuing to Blackpool North. A limited shuttle service will run between Crewe and Holyhead, plus connections to Shrewsbury and Wrexham. Ticket sales for future travel have been suspended temporarily until the retailing systems can be updated.

Avanti said: ‘From 14 August until further notice, we will be introducing a reduced timetable. This is due to the current industrial relations climate which has resulted in severe staff shortages in some grades through increased sickness levels, as well as unofficial strike action by ASLEF members.

‘As a result of the majority of drivers declaring themselves unavailable for overtime our customers have faced multiple short-notice cancellations on our network which has had a severe impact on their plans.

‘The reduced timetable is being introduced to ensure a reliable service is delivered so our customers can travel with greater certainty. This decision was not taken lightly, and we are sorry for the enormous frustration and inconvenience this will cause.

‘We urge the rail unions to engage in meaningful industry reform talks around modernising working practices and developing a railway fit for the 21st century and we remain open for talks at any time.’

However, the RMT says allegations of unofficial strike action are ‘unsubstantiated’, and are ‘something that RMT and other unions strongly deny’.

RMT general secretary Mick Lynch has written to transport secretary Grant Shapps, saying: ‘Avanti are falsely and shamefully making allegations that this decision is due to unofficial industrial action when the reality is this decision arises from poor management, cutting staffing to the bare minimum and rock bottom staff morale.

‘I am presuming that you sanctioned this decision, and I would therefore be grateful for an urgent meeting to discuss the crisis, including clarification of the following points: Confirmation that your permission was required for Avanti to implement a reduced timetable. Is Avanti in breach of their contract with the Department of Transport and what sanctions will you be taking against Avanti? Has public ownership of the contract been considered?’

The DfT has yet to comment.

Reader Comments:

Views expressed in submitted comments are that of the author, and not necessarily shared by Railnews.

  • david c smith, Bletchley

    One issue seems to be " how to hold aTOC to its contract". Well, it may be relevant to wonder whether TOCs on Intercity routes such as Manchester - London would try to get away with putting cost minimisation above passenger well being , if effective competition were to be in place.

    As for commuters, where competition isn't feasible , their interests could be protected through being able to directly elect their local conurbation's rail " supremo",

    There does seem , in the present rail troubles to be a concentration of power in the hands of everybody except the customer / passenger.

  • Steve Alston, Crewe

    The upcoming legal action will determine if FirstGroup plc* t/a Avanti and Shapps were correct in referring to their shocking shortage of drivers as a strike.

    Those Tory comment writers on here, always desperate to defend the dodgy companies (who pocket taxpayers cash for a poor, not contractually compliant job) will again be proved wrong.

    Another dispute, which Shapps claimed was between "companies and the union, not the government" was proven in a legal test funded by the TUC to be definitively a "dispute between unions and government".

    [* and Trenitalia--Ed.]

  • Neil Palmer, Waterloo

    If it looks like a strike, sounds like a strike, and stops trains like a strike, then it probably is a strike.

  • H. Gillies-Smith, South Milford

    Interesting this, don't remember the unions creating such a fuss when Northern Trains cut their services on a number of lines at the beginning of the current timetable.
    [I think you will find that the unions are objecting to the 'unofficial strike action' suggestion.--Ed.]