Posted 27th November 2012 | 3 Comments

Civil servant to sue DfT over West Coast fiasco

ONE OF the civil servants who was suspended after the West Coast franchise competition was cancelled has started High Court action against the Department for Transport, claiming that her career has been damaged by its actions.

Solicitors acting for Kate Mingay told Railnews she has launched proceedings, although they could not confirm reports that the first hearing will be on Thursday this week.

Ms Mingay issued a statement in early October in which she had said that "my role has been inaccurately portrayed, mainly due to statements and other comment made by the Department for Transport itself. I would like to make it clear that I did not have lead responsibility for this project. Neither I nor any member of my team had any responsibility for the economic modelling for this project or for any Department for Transport project. Nor did I have any responsibility for the financial modelling".

Ms Mingay is one of three officials who were suspended by DfT permanent secretary Philip Rutnam on 3 October, only hours after transport secretary Patrick McLoughlin admitted that his department's assessment of the four West Coast bids had included 'serious technical flaws'.

Runner-up Virgin Trains had mounted a legal challenge to the award of the franchise to FirstGroup at the end of August, preventing the completion of the deal with FirstGroup.

Although Virgin withdrew after the DfT had cancelled the award and announced three inquiries into what had gone wrong, Ms Mingay's legal action may affect the Department's timetable for publishing one of the reports, which is the result of an inquiry into how the West Coast assessment had gone awry.

This inquiry, by Centrica chief executive Sam Laidlaw, is due to produce its final report at the end of this week.

The DfT said it did not comment on staff matters.

Meanwhile the identity of the Intercity West Coast operator from 9 December remains unconfirmed, although the DfT has been discussing the terms of an emergency contract with Virgin Trains since 15 October.

Reader Comments:

Views expressed in submitted comments are that of the author, and not necessarily shared by Railnews.

  • phil gaskell, manchester

    who are the other two civil servants

  • jbzoom, Guildford

    Is Kate Mingay really seeking justice, or is she trying to prevent publication of a report which may explain why she was suspended? Either way she has given the civil servants involved a great excuse for a cover-up.

  • Tony Pearce, Reading UK

    I always did feel that the Civil Servants were going to be Scapegoats for this. I was a member of the Labour Party for several years. That taught me never to trust anyone in Politics, - whatever their party. And if they have 'power' - (a leading local Councillor, MP or Minister) then they were very adept at making sure they kept it. I'm sure the Civil Servants will eventually be made an 'offer they can't refuse' and they will go away quietly. I hope this isn't libellous !!!