Posted 13th January 2010 | 5 Comments
Conservatives would introduce longer, less bureaucratic franchises
The East Coast Main Line franchise has changed hands twice recently. Under Conservative plans, the next one could last 20 years.
THE Conservative Transport spokesman Theresa Villiers has outlined plans for longer passenger franchises, with less micro-management from government and more responsibility for upgrading stations and other infrastructure.
In a speech to the think tank Politeia, Ms Villiers said an incoming Conservative government would reform the franchise system by introducing longer contracts -- typically of 20 years -- and also reduce the level of intervention by the Department for Transport.
Franchise holders would also have a greater part to play in the upgrading of stations and other infrastructure.
The chief executive of the Association of Train Operating Companies Michael Roberts welcomed her plans. He said: “This is a recognition of the positive contribution which train companies have made to the success of the railways, and sets a clear vision which operators will welcome.
“Train companies have long argued that the current system is too bureaucratic, and that operators should have greater freedom to respond to what passengers want. We have proposed smart reforms to create a stronger partnership between private and public sectors through longer and more flexible franchises, which would allow train companies to invest in better services. It is very encouraging to see those arguments being developed, and we look forward to hearing more detail.
“Today’s proposal to give operators a wider role in upgrading stations and infrastructure are an important step forward, and would save significant costs while providing more benefits more quickly to passengers.
“We will be looking closely at the proposals made by all parties in the run-up to the election, and are confident that all parties support a strong and improving railway.”
Reader Comments:
Views expressed in submitted comments are that of the author, and not necessarily shared by Railnews.

Joel Kosminsky, London, Britain
Who is today's railway run for - passengers or profit-makers? If it's for the money, stop kidding. Any pretence of "better service to all passengers" is only at astronomic fares and taxpayer subsidy, which is legalised misrepresentation.
andrew ganley, Sutton, england
Abs right Amazed! my thought exactly, so being a long suffering 'customer' of FCC im going to have to put up with a shoddy,fly-by-night railway(sorry bus) operator for even longer?
Oh and good of them to settle the long running despute with their drivers,only took 3 months,what a disgracefull state of affairs.
John, Edinburgh
Where does this leave open access operators ?
Country Station, yorkshire
Upgrading of stations fine - no mention of making it easier to close them!
Amazed, Epsom, Uk
I'd love to know what "positve contribution" Michael Roberts is talking about ?
God help us if the Conservatives are going to accept this kind of drivel.