Posted 12th February 2013 | 8 Comments

Ambitious rolling stock strategy unveiled

A MAJOR PLAN for National Rail rolling stock over the next 30 years predicts that as many as 19,000 new vehicles may be needed and that the fleet may almost double in size. The new strategy, which has been produced by Network Rail, train operators and the major leasing companies, also suggests that comparatively few 'self-powered' trains will be built from now on, because electrification is expected to cover most of the network.

Network Rail group strategy director Paul Plummer pointed out that the plan "marks the first time that the long-term rolling stock implications of passenger growth and infrastructure upgrades such as electrification and HS2 have been modelled and considered together".

The significantly larger fleet of the future will be needed to cater for rising demand, and the report warns that there will be implications for infrastructure as well, with more depots and stabling sidings needed to accommodate the additional trains.

The proportion of the fleet powered by electricity is expected to rise from 68 per cent today to 80 per cent in 2019, as a result of projects which are already under way or authorised, such as electrification of the Great Western and Midland Main Lines. The report predicts this proportion couid rise to over 90 per cent by the early 2040s, which mark the far end of the present plan.

The modelled scenarios indicate that between 13,000 and 19,000 new electric vehicles will be required by 2042, which would require an average build rate of between eight and 12 vehicles a week. The report says the total could be still higher, depending on individual decisions by franchise bidders and funders about the relative merits of life extension or replacement of the present fleets. The requirements for new non-electric vehicles will be small by comparison – possibly as few as 400 to 800 over the next 30 years. These will be needed for the minority of routes which are unlikely to be electrified, at least in the foreseeable future.

The report's authors also point out that their document is 'not a cascade plan for the deployment of rolling stock. It is intended to help inform Government on potential approaches to rail strategy and to stimulate the industry to develop and deliver optimised whole-life, whole-system, rolling stock investments. We believe that the best way of achieving the latter is through the franchising process as this should provide market-driven solutions, procured in a competitive environment.'

ATOC chief executive Michael Roberts said: “The boom in passenger journeys heralds a bright future for the railways.  A long-term rolling stock strategy helps the industry prepare for that future and underpins franchising as the best way to drive efficient delivery of fleet which meets passengers’ needs.”

Angel Trains CEO Malcolm Brown said: “Rightly, the three rolling stock companies have been a corner stone in the development of the strategy to meet passenger demands for the next 30 years.

“The businesses will actively compete with each other to invest in existing and new rolling stock, having already secured over £10 billion of investment since rail privatisation. This will ensure the UK has one of the youngest train fleets in Europe.”

The publication of this plan comes at a critical time for the train-building industry. The Thameslink rolling stock order, for which Siemens has been preferred bidder since June 2011, has yet to be signed off, while the Bombardier plant at Derby is currently gaining several smaller orders for additional electric multiple units, including at least 57 vehicles for London Overground. The next major order will be for the London Crossrail fleet, for which Bombardier is expected to be a major contender.

Reader Comments:

Views expressed in submitted comments are that of the author, and not necessarily shared by Railnews.

  • George Davidson, Newport

    Surely, a first priority should be to build electric trains to replace the Voyagers between Birmingham and Scotland? These Voyagers could then be moved to other non wired routes to allow a cascade of stock and allow the scrapping of Pacers. For example, Class 150 Sprinters are often used between Cardiff & Taunton (or even Penzance). These could be replaced by Turbostars if Voyagers were say moved to Cardiff > Nottingham. The Class 150's could then replace Pacers.

  • MikeB, Liverpool

    Jack99, Oxford. Whilst agreeing with your sentiments about trains being built in the UK, the only current production line is Bombardier at Derby and, until Hitachi is established at Newton Aycliffe that situation will remain. Crewe works is also owned by Bombardier but today is merely a bogie repair plant and is unlikely to revert to new builds. Loughborough and Doncaster are both owned by Wabtech, who are not involved in train building and Eastleigh is now a small private company basically involved in overhauling heritage rolling stock.

  • jack99, Oxford

    Lets hope the new Rolling Stock can be built in UK Rail Workshops such as a resurrected Eastleigh , Crewe , Doncaster and Loughborough rather than Exporting jobs to Germany. Maybe Thameslink will come home as well ? As the preferred Contractor is having problems raising the finance.
    Only Britain could close down and demolish skilled Railway Engineering Workshops such as Swindon, Ashford , York , Washwood Heath etc

  • Tim, Devon

    I imagine with electrification and the Intercity Express Program there will be plenty of Turbostar, Coradia and Desiro sets floating around to replace the older Sprinters.

  • MikeB, Liverpool

    And there is still no sign of the Thamesink order debacle being resolved, which means ageing diesel trains will be running under the wires in the North West, for years after the electrification scheme is complete!!!

  • Melvyn Windebank, Canvey Island, Essex

    Given that some of the network will remain diesel powered surely a single bulk order for at least 100 carriages of DMUs could be purchased in order to eliminate pacers and other old trains ?

    Anyway we have heard this all before and we will believe it when the trains start coming off production lines and not just regurgitated by politicians!

  • Simon H Le Strange, Colne

    I do hope that the possible Colne to Skipton Rail Line Project has been included in these findings, as I am well aware of the benefits that a full electrification would have from Skipton North junction through to Preston's West Coast Main Line, this would link both the East and West Coast Main Lines together, not only for passengers but also for freight.

    Watch this space in 2016.

  • Tim, Devon

    The future is bright for the electrified areas. For the rest of the country we are stuck with an awful service with the dirty diesels