Posted 5th March 2009 | 5 Comments

Government sets up company to by-pass Roscos for 202 new DMUs

Transport Minister Lord Adonis.

WITH the Department for Transport still at war with the train leasing companies (Roscos) over their alleged high charges — and with the Roscos increasingly reluctant to finance new diesel-powered trains — the Government has set up a new company to oversee procurement of 202 new diesel multiple unit carriages.

Transport Minister Andrew Adonis announced that his Department had set up a new company, Diesel Trains Limited, to oversee the procurement of the additional vehicles (previously always referred to as 200 vehicles) to relieve overcrowding in the Thames Valley, around Bristol and on longer-distances in northern England.

The new trains — part of Chancellor Alistair Darling’s pre-budget review, announced last November — are set to enter service by 2012, subject to negotiations between the DfT and First Great Western, Trans-Pennine Express and Northern Rail.

Transport Minister Lord Adonis said: “This is the most effective way to buy new trains quickly and for the benefit of passengers. This new company is an illustration of the Government's commitment to reducing crowding for rail passengers.

“This is a milestone in the delivery of new carriages which will help to increase rail capacity on some of our busiest routes. I'm delighted we have reached such an important stage and that passengers will see the benefits within a relatively short period of time.”

In letters to industry partners, the DfT says it does not intend to be a long-term owner of trains and the new company is not intended to compete with other rolling stock leasing companies.

The Department said that to ensure this is the case it would invite the market to bid either for the company or for the assets and related contracts within it, and to take over the ownership and leasing of the trains.

However, the present Roscos have shown great reluctance to take on responsibility for new diesel trains, believing that electrification will be the long-term traction energy source and that any new diesel trains will have little residual value after a few years.

A formal complaint by the DfT about Rosco charges was referred last year to the Competition Commission – but the Commission largely supported the Roscos and blamed the level of leasing charges on the Government’s micro-management of passenger train franchises.

‘Rotem pulls out’

ONE of the companies invited by the Department for Transport to tender for the construction of 202 additional coaches, Hyundai Rotem of Korea, has reportedly withdrawn.

The remaining bidders are Bombardier Transportation, CAF of Spain, and Chinese Sourced Railway Equipment on behalf of CSR Nanjing Puzhen Rolling Stock Co., which is owned by the Chinese government.

Last week Rotem — in partnership with Mitsui of Japan and Tokyu Car Corporation of Japan — was awarded a €140 million (£124 million) order by Irish Railways, Iarnród Éireann, for 51 new Intercity railcar carriages … making the cost of each diesel-powered carriage worth more than £2.4 million.


Reader Comments:

Views expressed in submitted comments are that of the author, and not necessarily shared by Railnews.

  • Tom West,

    My understanding is that these will be DMUs, intended for regional services - which run on lines taht will be the last to get electrified. These untis will be needed until the end of their lives.

    Also, the reason teh ROSCOs won't pay if that the TOCs haven't been given any money to buy these DMUs...

  • GEOFF R, Westhoughton, UK

    Electrification would be the power source of choice, true. But remember last year, just before the totally pointless Ruth Kelly resigned and then the government appointed the even more pointless Adonis. It was all "we are looking at the business case for Electrification blah blah blah". Its all here on the railnews website, see for yourself. And then look at my reply. This utterly useless government wanted people to believe that Electrification was on the agenda to make it look like investment was on the way. I will state for the record again, FAT CHANCE, it isn't and it never will be. Do not I repeat do not beleive a word that (buff)Hoon and Adonis say ever again. Only when you see the wires go up, believe it then.

  • leslie burge, leicester, england

    Electric traction should be the long term energy source.
    So in that respect the ROSCO'S have got it right.
    What we need is the government to get off the fence and
    really invest in electrification. As for Diesel Trains Ltd
    well this is surely just sour grapes from successive
    government interference in the railway industry who cannot
    get anything right when it comes to our railways.
    It was our great government who set up the ROSCO's in the
    first place.

  • James Strachan, Cambridge

    All sounds like bad temper and spite to me.

    These new units are meant to support existing services on what used to be the GWR.

    Will they be compatible with existing units ? who will maintain them ?

    The Government are cutting off thir nose to spite their face.

    I don't work for a TOC or a ROSCO so I can say this. Perhaps those who do should be braver.

  • David Faircloth, Derby, UK

    This should be quite a simple process; but can we trust the DfT not to make a mess of it?

    All that's necessary is for Diesel Trains Ltd to agree a procurement contract with the supplier who submits the accepted tender. Then, a 'carve out' is agreed, and title and the obligation to pay for the trains is novated to a third-party; simultaneously with this, a hire contract will come into effect between a TOC and the owning third-party. Transfer Schemes will be used to transfer vehicles between TOCs, as necessary.

    Quite simple, really.