Posted 6th June 2013 | 3 Comments

Setback for Eurotunnel's ferry plans

CHANNEL TUNNEL operator Eurotunnel is to appeal against a ruling which will prevent its operation of ferry services to Dover. The Competition Commission has stepped in after Eurotunnel took over the failing ferry company SeaFrance, but Eurotunnel is claiming that Cross-Channel prices are now set to rise.

The Commission said Eurotunnel's acquisition of three ferries and other assets could mean higher prices for cross-Channel passengers and freight customers. It added that by adding ferry services to its existing Channel Tunnel business, Eurotunnel was increasing its market share to more than half.

Eurotunnel said it found the ruling 'incomprehensible and seriously disproportionate', and that the decision was 'not based on any concrete facts, but solely upon a random association of virtual hypothesis'.

It also accused the Commission of creating a 'duopoly' across the Straits of Dover, reducing customer choice, and prohibiting access to a port 'in total contradiction with the freedom of movement incarnate in Europe'.

The company added that the Commission was ignoring a ruling of the Paris Commercial Court which had linked the sale of SeaFrance with a requirement not to resell its assets within five years, and that a decision of the French Competition Authority was being contradicted.

Eurotunnel's chairman and chief executive Jacques Gounon said: "This decision by the Competition Commission will reduce the choice of services across the Straits of Dover to the detriment of the consumer. It will inevitably lead to an increase in the price of a crossing."

The Commission's deputy chairman Alasdair Smith led the inquiry into Eurotunnel's ferry service.

He said: "It cannot be good for competition when Eurotunnel, which already holds a market share of over 40 per cent, moves into the ferry business—particularly when it did so to stop a competitor from buying the ferries. Customers would lose out from Eurotunnel increasing its share even further and being able to raise prices on the tunnel services.

"In view of the current excess capacity on the Dover–Calais route, it also seems likely that one of the current ferry operators will exit in the short term if we don’t take action. Customers will be better off if there are two independent ferry companies competing with the tunnel.

"We did consider ordering Eurotunnel to sell the ferries but we were conscious of the uncertainties and possible delays affecting a sale. We can achieve the same outcome this way and it should be clear that we will not be diverted from ensuring the best result for customers."

The Commission added that Eurotunnel now has a 'limited period' in which to sell its two largest ferries to one or more purchasers approved by the Commission, as a way of solving the competition problem

Reader Comments:

Views expressed in submitted comments are that of the author, and not necessarily shared by Railnews.

  • Stephen Cryan, Warrington

    I stand corrected. Thank you.
    However, the other comments are valid. Is the ball not now in the court of the European Competition authorities?

  • Mark, WINCHESTER

    @Stephen Cryan, The Competition Commission IS the British authority on this matter. It is not a European body, but one which reports to Vince Cables department.

  • Stephen Cryan, Warrington

    It just goes to show how the French look after their own. Eurotunnel has a majority French shareholding which is why the French competition authorities permitted the purchase of the failed SeaFrance. And Eurotunnel could not sell it on for 5 years!!! Complete madness.

    It is a good move by the European Competition authorities to prohibit the purchase. There is no way Eurotunnel could be permitted to buy a ferry competitor. The Competition Commission should stand firm on this.

    And what about the British authorities? Since SeaFrance trades into Britain I am sure they have a right to give an opinion, which should be to back up the European authorities. Or are we kowtowing to the French, yet again.